Information hubs in a post-email world — Adoption Curve
 
 

Information hubs in a post-email world

I came across an interesting summary article from MIT titled “In today’s knowledge-based economy, it pays to be an ‘information hub’”, based on some research looking at email flows:

“The researchers found that information workers whose strong e-mail networks allow them to receive new information sooner than their peers — or to receive more pieces of new information — are likely to be more productive than their less well-connected counterparts. Workers who are “information hubs” complete more projects in a given period of time and thus generate more revenue for their firm.

As part of a study of an executive recruiting firm conducted over a five-year period, the researchers were able to analyze ten months of the firm’s e-mail traffic. While the content of the recruiting firms’ e-mails was encrypted to ensure individuals’ privacy, the research team could track the flow of particular encrypted words through the firm’s e-mail network. The researchers then correlated those findings with data (provided by the firm and by individual employees who voluntarily took part in a survey) about factors such as individual workers’ project workload, project completion time and compensation — to gain dramatic new insights into productivity in the Information Age.”

There are some interesting ideas here, but the research was email-based – thus missing out on any other types of communication that the subjects were plugged into. It would be fascinating to run the same research again, but this time plugging in non-email communication routes, such as IM or Twitter. Does being connected to a network of like-minded Twitterers make you more effective, or does it result in information overload and productivity decreases?

And it’s also unusual to read some positive findings relating to email – the trend seems to be for it to be regarded as a problem rather than part of the solution. I’ll admit to being sceptical about email being entirely and unremittingly evil – like any tool, it can be misused, but there are obviously situations where it adds value. Perhaps the most telling reflection of the way that the information landscape has changed is that I didn’t find this article in my inbox – instead it popped up on a newsfeed of someone else’s bookmarks, a combination of RSS feeds and social bookmarking in action.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

2 comments

  1. [...] hacia la obsolescencia. El artículo del grupo del MIT ha sido comentado en Adoption Curve, Information hubs in a post-email world, donde se preguntan por la relevancia de estos resultados en entornos en los que el correo cede [...]

  2. [...] hacia la obsolescencia“, y a propósito cita al blog Adoption Curve en su post “Information hubs in a post-email world”, donde “se preguntan por la relevancia de estos resultados en entornos en los que el correo [...]

Leave a comment

 
 

About

Hello, I'm Tim. I'm a geek who builds online and mobile software and also takes photographs and messes around with technology. This is my personal website.

You can find out more about me and browse through the full archives. I also take photographs, and hack around with things. You can find me elsewhere on the interwebs, get in touch, or subscribe to a feed from this site.

Creative Commons License
The site's content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License, unless indicated otherwise. Please don't steal it :-)

About this site

This site is powered by Wordpress, and hosted by the nice people at Linode. The template is custom-built and based on 960bc and the 960 grid.