About   |   Projects   |   Elsewhere   |   Work   |   Feeds   |   Contact

Archive for 6 April 2008

Plans for satellite tags shelved

From the Tell-Me-That-It-Wasn’t-Bleeding-Obvious-That-It-Wouldn’t-Work-The-First-Time-Around department:

Plans to use satellite tracking to monitor sex offenders have been shelved by the government.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said the project had been suspended pending further “developments in technology”.

A two-year pilot scheme found that the equipment could be blocked or distorted by high rise buildings or even trees.

However, just in case your faith in the ability of government to deal with the bleedin’ obvious was beginning to recover a little, fear not. Woo and technological pixie dust still have a part to play in government:

Ministers are now believed to be planning to use lie detectors as a new technique to deal with paedophiles.

Legislation was passed last year to expand the programmes of polygraph or lie detector tests.

It’s discredited technology, so it’s no great suprise that the MoJ are about to order a gazillion pounds-worth. Probably from EDS.

However, they are at least being honest about the reasons for this:

Napo’s spokesman said: “The polygraph is likely to be of limited value because sex offenders can manipulate the outcomes.

“It remains the case, however, that sufficient controls should be in place for each individual case to maximise public perception, ” he said.

Which translated from PR-speak means, “We know that they’re fucking useless, but this looks good in a Daily Mail headline so we’re going to do it anyway.”

6 April 2008

Change

No comments yet

Have you got my fingers?

Biometrics as the *sole guarantor* of someone’s identity is a daft and broken idea, despite what our nodding dog of a Home Secretary has to say on the subject. As if further proof were needed, the German Interior Minister lost his fingerprints to the Chaos Computer Club, and now No2ID are offering a £1,000 reward for the fingerprints of Gordon Brown or Nodding Dog.

Herr Schauble now has a somewhat plausible defence if his fingerprints turn up at the scene of a crime somewhere, and no doubt Brown and Smith’s Special Branch bodyguards will now have crockery collection added to their list of tasks when protecting our Glorious Leaders.

Which got me wondering – if enough people were to put their fingerprints into the public domain (or at least the information needed to create artificial fingerprints, as per the Chaos Computer Club procedure), would this poison the value of fingerprints as a biometric identifier? If I could point to an online and freely-accessible database that contained my fingerprint data, could I then turn around and claim that while *you* think that those are my fingers, they might equally belong to somebody’s who’s made themselves their own pair?

6 April 2008

Change

1 comment

They'll be prising his gun from his cold, dead fingers, then…

New York Times: Charlton Heston, Legendary Actor, Is Dead

6 April 2008

Change

No comments yet

links for 2008-04-06

6 April 2008

Links

No comments yet